The NSW Government released its budget today, and so I was wondering if it contained anything about negotiations about the possible extension of Eraring Power Station…
I’ve not had any time to read the details (a quick search reveals 2 references to Eraring, but both of these refer to considerations relating to the earlier sale process from several years ago). However I note that Alexi Demetriadi did write ‘No Eraring extension money in budget as NSW Treasurer targets bill relief, renewables’ in the Australian:
Paul was one of the founders of Global-Roam in February 2000. He is currently the CEO of the company and the principal author of WattClarity. Writing for WattClarity has become a natural extension of his work in understanding the electricity market, enabling him to lead the team in developing better software for clients.
Before co-founding the company, Paul worked as a Mechanical Engineer for the Queensland Electricity Commission in the early 1990s. He also gained international experience in Japan, the United States, Canada, the UK, and Argentina as part of his ES Cornwall Memorial Scholarship.
It’s Tuesday 21st May 2024 and the AEMO has published an update to the 2023 ESOO … about 8 months since the publication of the prior release, and 4 months before the 2024 ESOO. Some implications for the anticipated closure of Eraring?
I alluded to the following comments in Wednesday’s article about the possible early closure of Gladstone Power Station … though we did not have time to note them at the time. We were not at the ‘Energy Nation 2025’ conference…
A question on Twitter from Benny Beatts (about dispatch of Origin’s Eraring unit 2 on Monday 30th May) illustrates why price setting is not as simple as adding up bids that are dispatched.
Be the first to commenton "The NSW budget today (Tue 19th Sept) and negotiations over Eraring"
Be the first to comment on "The NSW budget today (Tue 19th Sept) and negotiations over Eraring"