I’ve not been posting about this type of frequency disruption in recent months (focused elsewhere) but worth a short note because of a 295MW drop in output from Loy Yang A3 just prior to 14:06 (NEM time) on Tuesday 20th May 2025:
Here’s a quick look at the live frequency trace for the mainland over the past hour:
Paul was one of the founders of Global-Roam in February 2000. He is currently the CEO of the company and the principal author of WattClarity. Writing for WattClarity has become a natural extension of his work in understanding the electricity market, enabling him to lead the team in developing better software for clients.
Before co-founding the company, Paul worked as a Mechanical Engineer for the Queensland Electricity Commission in the early 1990s. He also gained international experience in Japan, the United States, Canada, the UK, and Argentina as part of his ES Cornwall Memorial Scholarship.
TARONG#1 has come offline from close to minimum load this morning, closely followed by TARONG#2 (also from close to minimum load) – Wednesday 28th February 2024
Yesterday (Tue 26th Sept 2023) we saw Kogan Creek drop offline for a few hours – and were asked if this was related to industrial action. Here, with the benefit of ‘next day public’ data, we take a first look.
In this article we take a look at operations of Waratah BESS through August 2025 – including some large Dispatch Errors on several days:
(a) including Fri 29th Aug 2025, and how WTAH1 apparently helped to drive frequency the wrong way;
(b) and Tue 19th Aug 2025, where WTAH1 helped to restrain frequency.
Guest author (and power system control specialist), Kate Summers, looks at what’s changed since she published a paper on frequency control in the NEM back in January 2017.
1 Commenton "Loy Yang A3 offline on Tuesday afternoon 20th May 2025 – small frequency drop"
If the NEM at the time was about 21GW then yes, the bump is about right for the loss of 300MW odd. Interesting the relatively slow recovery. Must be about the deadband setting. I thought the magic batteries were bidding in for small signal raise????
If the NEM at the time was about 21GW then yes, the bump is about right for the loss of 300MW odd. Interesting the relatively slow recovery. Must be about the deadband setting. I thought the magic batteries were bidding in for small signal raise????