Across 201 x Semi-Scheduled units, which were the biggest over-performers (Saturday afternoon 11th April) driving the frequency high?

In recent days we’ve already written:

1)  Several articles about a notable Frequency Spike at 10:30 on Friday 10th April 2026:

(a)  which appears to be due to some glitch in UIGF forecasting at the AEMO

… possibly compounded by some ‘Games that Self-Forecasters can Play’.

(b)  and led to frequency spiking up outside the Normal Operating Frequency Band for a Dispatch Interval.

2)  And we’ve also published two articles about an eerily similar Frequency Spike at 14:20 on Saturday 11th April 2026 :

(a)  which appears to have been due to very similar cause

(b)  this is the third article about this event.

 

There are 115 x Semi-Scheduled Solar Farms and 86 x Semi-Scheduled Wind Farms currently in AEMO’s data systems.

… so all up that means 201 x Semi-Scheduled units (both Wind and Solar) across all regions of the NEM.

 

 

Dispatch Error for all 201 units at 14:20

In this article we’ll look specifically at calculated Dispatch Error for the 14:20 dispatch interval (NEM time) on Saturday 11th April 2026 – starting with the 115 x Solar Farms:

2026-04-11-at-14-20-ez2view-TrendExtract-DispatchError-bySolarFarm

Remember that you can click on a chart for a larger resolution image in another tab that might enable you to read the DUIDs … though you might need to squint, as we used a small font to fit them in.

As noted on the image:

1)  There were 10 x Solar Farm units that each:

(a)  had over-performance (relative to Target) larger than 25MW

(b)  i.e. Dispatch Error < -25MW

(c)  Of these 10 units, 4 showed discrepancy larger than 50MW

2)  On the flip side, there was only 1 x Solar Farm with under-performance that large (i.e. larger than 25MW).

3)  So clearly an imbalanced dispatch

…. which is particularly notable because (as Allan described well here) the one-sided nature of the Semi-Dispatch Cap means large under-performance (ordinarily!) is much more common.

4)  These units were in various regions.

 

Next we’ll do the same for the 86 x Wind Farms:

2026-04-11-at-14-20-ez2view-TrendExtract-DispatchError-byWindFarm

With this image:

1)  Note that the same y-axis step of 25MW has been used, for consistency

… this shows that the higher exceedances were higher for Wind Farms than for Solar Farms

2)  We see that there were 12 x Wind Farm units that each:

(a)  had over-performance (relative to Target) larger than 25MW

(b)  i.e. Dispatch Error < -25MW

(c)  Of these 12 units, 8 showed discrepancy larger than 50MW

2)  On the flip side, there was not a single Wind Farm with under-performance that large (i.e. larger than 25MW).

3)  These units were in various regions.

 

 

Across all 201 units … some head scratching results

Summing up, across 201 units:

1)  There were 22 units with over-performance greater than 25MW;

2)  Which is a staggering number:

(a)  That’s ~10% of all Semi-Scheduled units!

(b)  That’s 22 times the number of units with under-performance greater than 25MW;

(c)  Which is even more notable because (as Allan described well here) the one-sided nature of the Semi-Dispatch Cap means large under-performance (ordinarily!) is much more common.

3)  Surely it’s causing some head-scratching, with concerns about system stability?


About the Author

Paul McArdle
Paul was one of the founders of Global-Roam in February 2000. He is currently the CEO of the company and the principal author of WattClarity. Writing for WattClarity has become a natural extension of his work in understanding the electricity market, enabling him to lead the team in developing better software for clients. Before co-founding the company, Paul worked as a Mechanical Engineer for the Queensland Electricity Commission in the early 1990s. He also gained international experience in Japan, the United States, Canada, the UK, and Argentina as part of his ES Cornwall Memorial Scholarship.

1 Comment on "Across 201 x Semi-Scheduled units, which were the biggest over-performers (Saturday afternoon 11th April) driving the frequency high?"

  1. 550+MW of over performance? Call it what you like, but I call it Nonconformance. 550 is a huge matter, particularly if all the governor controlled units are near minimum load. This is serious territory that cannot be spoken about lightly. I hope the Under-frequency load shedding system will save some sections of the system on the way down.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.


*