In recent days we’ve already written:
1) Several articles about a notable Frequency Spike at 10:30 on Friday 10th April 2026:
(a) which appears to be due to some glitch in UIGF forecasting at the AEMO
… possibly compounded by some ‘Games that Self-Forecasters can Play’.
(b) and led to frequency spiking up outside the Normal Operating Frequency Band for a Dispatch Interval.
2) And we’ve also published two articles about an eerily similar Frequency Spike at 14:20 on Saturday 11th April 2026 :
(a) which appears to have been due to very similar cause
(b) this is the third article about this event.
There are 115 x Semi-Scheduled Solar Farms and 86 x Semi-Scheduled Wind Farms currently in AEMO’s data systems.
… so all up that means 201 x Semi-Scheduled units (both Wind and Solar) across all regions of the NEM.
Dispatch Error for all 201 units at 14:20
In this article we’ll look specifically at calculated Dispatch Error for the 14:20 dispatch interval (NEM time) on Saturday 11th April 2026 – starting with the 115 x Solar Farms:
Remember that you can click on a chart for a larger resolution image in another tab that might enable you to read the DUIDs … though you might need to squint, as we used a small font to fit them in.
As noted on the image:
1) There were 10 x Solar Farm units that each:
(a) had over-performance (relative to Target) larger than 25MW
(b) i.e. Dispatch Error < -25MW
(c) Of these 10 units, 4 showed discrepancy larger than 50MW
2) On the flip side, there was only 1 x Solar Farm with under-performance that large (i.e. larger than 25MW).
3) So clearly an imbalanced dispatch
…. which is particularly notable because (as Allan described well here) the one-sided nature of the Semi-Dispatch Cap means large under-performance (ordinarily!) is much more common.
4) These units were in various regions.
Next we’ll do the same for the 86 x Wind Farms:
With this image:
1) Note that the same y-axis step of 25MW has been used, for consistency
… this shows that the higher exceedances were higher for Wind Farms than for Solar Farms
2) We see that there were 12 x Wind Farm units that each:
(a) had over-performance (relative to Target) larger than 25MW
(b) i.e. Dispatch Error < -25MW
(c) Of these 12 units, 8 showed discrepancy larger than 50MW
2) On the flip side, there was not a single Wind Farm with under-performance that large (i.e. larger than 25MW).
3) These units were in various regions.
Across all 201 units … some head scratching results
Summing up, across 201 units:
1) There were 22 units with over-performance greater than 25MW;
2) Which is a staggering number:
(a) That’s ~10% of all Semi-Scheduled units!
(b) That’s 22 times the number of units with under-performance greater than 25MW;
(c) Which is even more notable because (as Allan described well here) the one-sided nature of the Semi-Dispatch Cap means large under-performance (ordinarily!) is much more common.
3) Surely it’s causing some head-scratching, with concerns about system stability?

550+MW of over performance? Call it what you like, but I call it Nonconformance. 550 is a huge matter, particularly if all the governor controlled units are near minimum load. This is serious territory that cannot be spoken about lightly. I hope the Under-frequency load shedding system will save some sections of the system on the way down.