Energy ministers greenlight ESEM consultation package, with maiden tender targeted for 2027
An update on the ESEM design process, following last Friday's energy ministers council meeting and the minutes of the industry-led working group.
Nelson Review
How the CIS differs from state-based underwriting schemes, and what the industry has suggested about it so far
We look at five design differences between the Capacity Investment Scheme and the state auction schemes that came before and alongside it — and the improvements we've heard suggested by industry and the Nelson Review panel.
Final Nelson Review report and ministerial communique released on Tuesday 16th December 2025
The final report of the Nelson Review has been released alongside a ministerial council communique, with ministers agreeing in principle to the review’s core recommendations, with the exception of Queensland.
AEMO requests that Notice of Closure be extended to 5 years (in some cases)
Flagging (from the AEMO rule change request on 14th November 2025) the request to extend Notice of Closure to 5 years ... and to remind readers of thoughts already submitted to the Nelson Review panel about this.
Reflections from our presentation to the CEC this week: A stocktake on the CIS
Linton and I had the pleasure of speaking to the CEC on Wednesday, this short article shares a couple of slides from the presentation and a list of questions we're still pondering about the CIS.
Two *big concerns* that we urge the Nelson Review panel to (re)consider (with respect to Invisible Responses) following review of the Draft Report
With All Energy happening this week in Melbourne, plus the clock ticking down on preparations at the Nelson Review Panel for their final report, I've reached back to the NEMdev conference to write about 2 big concerns with the draft Recommendations 2A and 2B.
Some suggestions for the Nelson Review panel to consider (with respect to Forecasting) following review of the Draft Report
Following my presentation at NEMdev 2025 (on 8th Oct 2025), here are some suggestions that the Nelson Review panel might consider - with respect to forecasting.
Are CIS-ters doin’ it for themselves? Part 4: Policy lessons highlighted by the Nelson Review
In the final part of our four-part CIS series, we zoom out to examine what government-backed Contract-for-Difference schemes are really achieving — drawing on policy lessons from the Nelson Review.
Three themes from NEMDEV 2025
Dan shares a short reflection on three high-level themes that resonated throughout the NEMDEV conference in Brisbane this week. From winter reliability to rising costs and market reform, the discussions raised important questions about how the NEM will — and should — evolve in the...
What happens, when Supply ≠ Demand?
For short term reasons (related to the Nelson Review and the NEMDev conference) and longer-term reasons, we thought it was useful to post this as a stand-alone article now.
The Nelson Review panel ‘has identified’ the Schism
Continuing to walk through the draft Report of the Nelson Review, we see that the authors 'identified that most historic policy interventions have been incomplete' (i.e. speak to the Schism).
Finally!! … A Major Review that sees (more closely) what’s actually been happening with Demand Response!
In part because I'm speaking at the NEMDev conference (Wed 8th Oct 2025 in Brisbane) we're taking a pass through the draft Report of the Nelson Review. Some (more realistic than earlier Reviews) statements about the extent of Demand Response in the NEM jumped out.
3 high-level questions, for considering the draft report of the Nelson Review
Here's three high-level questions we've been trying to keep in mind, in our reading of the draft Report of the Nelson Review panel - for some belated (informal) submissions here on WattClarity.
Some of the ‘Major Reviews’ in the history of the NEM
I thought it would be useful to pull together this (incomplete) tabulated list of major reviews in the history of the NEM.
Are CIS-ters doin’ it for themselves? Part 2: Understanding why there are delivery challenges
In part two of this four part series about the success of the CIS so far, we explore why delivery challenges may have emerged.
AEMC releases July 2024 working paper ‘Addressing the risk of algorithmic collusion’
Today we were alerted that the AEMC had belatedly published this 15-page Staff Working Paper titled ‘Addressing the risk of algorithmic collusion’.
Would it even be possible – to operate the NEM to achieve 82% renewable energy in 2030 (if the Semi-Scheduled category continues in its current form)?
Yesterday's release of the draft report of the Nelson Review has prompted me to re-frame a question I've asked before about the Semi-Scheduled category.
Video recording of presentation by the Nelson Review panel (on Wed 6th Aug 2025), hosted by The Energy, available now
Yesterday (Wed 6th Aug 2025) we saw the draft report from the ‘Nelson Review’ Panel released ... followed by a presentation by the panel members facilitated by The Energy. The recording of this webinar is now available, and here it is.
Draft Report from the ‘Nelson Review’ Panel is released, on Wednesday 6th August 2025
In yesterday’s wrap of the past 5 weeks, I’d noted that Tim Nelson (when speaking at #ACES2025 last Tuesday) said that the Panel had not quite finished the draft report, but it was ‘imminent’. So here’s a brief article today to note that the draft...
Four answers we received during the 2025 Clean Energy Summit in Sydney this week
Dan provides his review for ACES 2025, and tries to answer some of the questions we were pondering going into the conference.