Up until Saturday 7th June 2025) Regulation FCAS costs were recovered by a single sided ‘Causer Pays’ method (and there was no payment for PFR)
From Sunday 8th June 2025) recovered by a new method based on performance against a new measure of frequency requirement and tighter link between performance, system need, and cost allocated. The change is part of the ‘Frequency Performance Payments’ reform.
Guest author (Dr Julian de Hoog) provides some analysis of what has unfolded over the first year of operation of the new Frequency Performance Payments, (FPP) regime - with a particular focus on solar farms.
We've facilitated a number of articles on WattClarity relating to the looming FPP changes (now 10 weeks away). Here's two images I've drawn up to (hopefully) illustrate my understanding of what these changes represent.
In his third article, Jack Fox uses the Non Financial Operation (NFO) data to take a look at some VRE units, and how they would have performed under FPP.
In his second article, Jack Fox uses the Non Financial Operation (NFO) data to take a look specifically at batteries, and how they would have performed under FPP.
In his first article, Jack Fox reports some initial observations from a review of the Non Financial Operations (NFO) data that's been published since Dec 2024.
Various authors have shared articles about frequency, frequency control and Regulation FCAS in recent times (including 6 from Linton). Here's three things that jumped out to me in these pieces of analysis.
The implementation of the Primary frequency response incentive arrangements rule is driving change in how system frequency is controlled and paid-for. The changes stem from how the NEM will incentivise primary frequency response. 6 Years in the making The rule change proposal was initiated July...
Semi-scheduled generators shouldn't treat self-forecasts as commercial parameters. The regulator holds significant concerns with the biasing of self-forecasts for commercial benefit.