Here’s a growing collection of articles we’re putting together with respect to the concerns of energy users.
These articles are informed by interaction with a wide range of large commercial and industrial (C&I) energy users in a variety of different settings:
1) One-on-one interactions with our clients and others in their offices or industrial facilities; and
2) Collective interactions through conferences (such as those posted about here), through EUAA Members Meetings, and through other events.
One of three founders of Global-Roam back in 2000, Paul has been CEO of the company since that time.
As an author on WattClarity, Paul's focus has been to help make the electricity market more understandable.
A belated article recording how (on Friday 12th April at 10:48) the Sheffield – Farrell No.2 220 kV line tripped during restoration due to fault on the line, disconnecting ~550MW of major industrial load in Tasmania.
Some ideas that I have been puzzling over – about the overlaps and contradictions between 3 rule changes under consideration at the AEMC currently
1) The Demand Response Mechanism (better known as the Negawatt buyback mechanism)
2) The Bidding in Good Faith deliberation
3) The Requirement for Price-Responsive (large) Demand to bid into central dispatch
A quick note about the need to avoid focusing on average emissions intensity (for the wrong reasons) and losing sight of the fact that it’s the emissions intensity of the next marginal unit of production that should be used for making short-term consumption decisions (if the objective is reducing your environmental footprint, as an energy user).
A few thoughts about how energy users (including each of us) are the main victims in the unfolding train wreck that’s become of this energy transition off the rails.
Be the first to commenton "Concerns of Energy Users"
Be the first to comment on "Concerns of Energy Users"